The seemingly free social media products we use every day help us to stay connected, learn new things, and find information. But they also analyze our actions and the data we share, using what they learn about us to trick us into paying attention to them more than we want. They sell that attention—and ultimately changes in what we think and how we behave—to advertisers. These social media products are caught in a race to capture our attention in order to make money.
In this issue guide, you’ll learn:
By understanding these key points, you’ll begin to see how you can help push for technology that aligns with humanity’s best interests.
As the generation that has grown up with social media, you know it has incredible power. That power can build connections, lift up our voices, and help us solve problems.
But social media can also distract us, divide us, and downgrade our collective ability to solve problems. Consider these excerpts from MySocialTruth, a story bank project for young people to share their experience on and off social media:
For Anuja and Sam, the addiction and distortion they faced on social media was not an example of technology that supports our wellbeing and larger goals.
Think about your own experience on social media.
Let’s go behind these experiences to look at how social media companies operate.
Our attention is a limited resource. There are only so many waking hours in the day, and therefore only so many things we can focus on. When we pay attention to one thing, we’re not paying attention to something else.
This fact of life has been deeply complicated by technology. With more information and more choices at our fingertips than ever before, there are unprecedented demands on our attention.
This feeling of constant distraction is fueled by tech companies that rely on capturing your attention to make money, normally by selling it to advertisers.
Advertising has always been about convincing you to do what the advertiser wants. It could be buying a new pair of shoes, taking an online class, or voting for a political candidate.
Traditional advertising on TV, newspapers, magazines, or billboards is very straightforward: everyone sees the same ads, and the ads don’t feed precise data back to advertisers about the people looking at them. Social media has several unique advantages that make advertising vastly more powerful:
All this gives social media intimate access to your thoughts and behavior. The goal is to find the right moment while you’re online to strategically grab your attention and insert an ad that you’ll engage with. That’s what these platforms promise to their advertisers.
Each app is caught in a race for your attention, competing not just against other apps, but also against your friends, your family, your hobbies, and even your sleep.
Social media companies keep finding new ways to win this race, making them among the most valuable companies in the world: Alphabet (the company that owns Google) is worth $1 trillion, and Facebook (which also owns Instagram and WhatsApp) is worth about $700 billion.
How are these extraordinary valuations possible when social media companies give away their products for free?
Because social media companies don’t sell software, they sell influence. They collect in-depth data about how to influence your decisions, then sell that influence to the highest bidder. The more time they can get you to spend scrolling and clicking, the more data they can collect and the more ads they can sell.
The reality is, social media apps are free to us because we are the product being sold.
We don’t pay up front to use apps like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok, but the competition between these platforms to capture your attention in exchange for advertising revenue is fierce. Because of this competitive environment, these platforms are using ever more sophisticated techniques to grab your attention and keep it.
The attention economy is made up of anything trying to capture our limited attention. Because companies are able to profit from your attention, there is intense competition within the attention economy.
Social media apps are incentivized, or motivated, to develop increasingly persuasive techniques – notifications, targeted content, personalized feeds, and more¹ – to:
That last point is particularly key to their success. Everything we do online is monitored and analyzed. Everything we’ve ever clicked on, how long we’ve hovered over a post in our feeds, how deep we've scrolled on our friends’ profiles – it’s all data that helps companies study us better. They are able to track behaviors like:
Apps then feed this information into complex algorithms² that determine which content to show us. Generally, algorithms use what they know about us to show us content that gets us to like, click, and share.
This doesn’t happen through sponsored ads only: videos that autoplay, promoted posts from influencers, and clickbait sites that cleverly disguise ads in posts are just a few of the examples of types of services paid for by advertising. On top of that, advertisers are able to target their messages to specific audiences: for example, by zip code, gender, age, relationship status, hobbies, job, education, and much more. (Check out the screenshot below to see just the basic targeting options Facebook offers to advertisers.)
More advanced options allow advertisers to target based on complex psychological factors. Say that someone wanted to target information at people likely to believe in conspiracy theories. They could identify a group of a few dozen conspiracy theory believers, then use “Lookalike” targeting to point ads at millions more. This technique has been used by everything from small businesses looking to find a niche audience to foreign governments trying to stop people from voting.
We’re told by social media apps that their goal is to connect, educate, and entertain through the sharing of photos, text, and information. The technology certainly does that some of the time.
But once we understand social media companies’ business model (how a business designs products and services to generate revenue) it’s obvious that their interests are not aligned with ours.
In Shoshana Zuboff’s quote above, she says that the ability to guarantee a successful ad is “what every business has always dreamt of.”
Now, take a look at the apps you use the most. Consider the things you post and the way you use the app.
Because social media apps are caught in a race for our attention, they tend to promote more provocative, attention-grabbing content. That’s what keeps us engaged and coming back. Emotionally-charged content on social media achieves between 17-24% more engagement per “moral-emotional word” than content without it.³
At the same time, everyone generates so much content each day that it’s impossible for platforms to show it all to us. Why do you see some posts and not others? Algorithms decide. They pick the content that is most likely to keep us liking and scrolling. They show us the stuff that's emotionally engaging and hide everything else.
We end up in an environment where we are all in competition with each other for attention. If we want our voices to be heard, we need to have more interesting posts. Usually that means:
If we want to be seen, we need to construct a less authentic version of ourselves and our lives, one that people will like, comment on, and share – and that algorithms will pick up and amplify. If we feed the algorithm, we get rewarded with attention; if we ignore the algorithm, then we feel like we’re being ignored.
In the process, we’re doing companies’ work, for free: we are creating the content they use to grab our attention. What’s more, the people with the most attention-grabbing content become influencers, who are then paid to keep coming up with the most attention-grabbing content.
In this environment, we see increasingly fake versions of each other, as well as a fake version of the world around us. The algorithm doesn’t show you everything that the people you follow post – it shows you the content that is most likely to get you to like and share.
If you like fashion you’ll be surrounded by friends and influencers being glamorous. If you care about the environment, you’ll be surrounded by emotionally intense calls to save the planet. You’ll see a uniquely crafted version of reality that is more sensational than the real thing, since that’s what will keep your attention.
Find a partner, and open up the same social media app. Scroll through their main feed (and please refrain from looking at any of their notifications, messages, etc.).
Now, think about someone who deeply disagrees with you about some of your core beliefs.
Please don’t share your feed or read someone else’s feed without mutual consent. If you’re working in a group, ask for two volunteers to share their feeds with each other and get permission to share their answers with the group.
Consider the big picture. What happens to our collective view of reality when we’re each receiving different information that’s motivated by these incentives? When we’re in competition to get the most likes and shares? And when the most sensational content is what helps us feel seen?
We quickly end up on a path to a distorted view of both reality and ourselves.
Morgan’s story from #MySocialTruth is just one of billions of experiences in a social media environment distorted by the attention economy. To understand why stories like this one keep happening around the world, we need to understand the system that produces them.
Stories like this are part of a pattern of experiences that show up again and again in social media. These patterns are the results of mechanisms like algorithms that optimize for engagement, concrete features that define our experience with technology.
These mechanisms, in turn, are the result of ways of thinking within technology companies. Assumptions like “if people are engaging with our product it must be helping them live better lives” are baked into the way that technology is built.
Together, these patterns, mechanisms, and ways of thinking make up a system that has harmed society in countless ways, including:
Each of these problems is the subject of extensive study.⁴ While they may seem distinct, they share a root cause: technology that is incentivized and over-optimized to capture attention from its users.
When we consider the scale of these harms and the size of the largest companies competing in the attention economy, we can easily feel overwhelmed. All of us have complicated relationships with technology, and most of us don’t have a great way to talk about them. What’s more, we don’t want companies taking advantage of us.
Consider some assumptions we have about social media. We might think that
In order to build a better system we will have to deeply reconsider these beliefs, and find new ways to connect around what matters to us. We will go deeper into some ways to do this in later issue guides.
Beyond individual change, advocacy is an important way to push for change. When the public raises their voices and puts intense pressure on companies, the companies are forced to spend time and money to address the harms. Their once- profitable business model can become unsustainable.
For instance, once-unstoppable cigarette companies have been forced to pay for the public health costs of their products, and for anti-smoking marketing campaigns. Oil companies are pressured to make clean energy investment as the costs of climate change become clearer to an increasingly activated public. Consumer advocacy has made a difference in industries ranging from meat-packing to pesticides.
Technology – especially social media – is facing this same reckoning today, as users, governments, and technologists alike come to understand just how dangerous these products are for society, and how quickly the fixes must happen.
Supporting one another is the first step towards understanding how to push back against technology that creates harm: through education, through regulation, and by building new technology built on better assumptions.⁵
Often, politicians and tech workers have conversations about young peoples’ experience on social media without their voices in the room. You will inherit the world that is made by their decisions. When you can clearly articulate your experiences and the change that you want to see, you add a much-needed perspective to the conversation about transforming social media.
This makes you especially powerful advocates for change. As the generation most deeply impacted by these issues, your truth is most potent when it’s voiced by you.
When you share your stories, organize your communities, and demand change, the world will listen.
We’ve discussed how technology designed to capture as much attention as possible from as many people as possible creates major societal harms.